Just curious...
I already have one of these bikes that I previously identified as a 58 or 59. It was a $30 craigslist special that was rideable when I picked it up. Has a kinda funky cantilever frame with two thin top tubes instead of one big one. It's a neat little rat. Anyway, I may have an opportunity to purchase another.
I know that there are obviously some bikes that were pretty well made back then and some that well, weren't. From what I've heard from some, the old chicago schwinns are nearly indestructable. What is the general consensus of the quality on the Rollfast brand? Good? Bad? Average???
I already have one of these bikes that I previously identified as a 58 or 59. It was a $30 craigslist special that was rideable when I picked it up. Has a kinda funky cantilever frame with two thin top tubes instead of one big one. It's a neat little rat. Anyway, I may have an opportunity to purchase another.
I know that there are obviously some bikes that were pretty well made back then and some that well, weren't. From what I've heard from some, the old chicago schwinns are nearly indestructable. What is the general consensus of the quality on the Rollfast brand? Good? Bad? Average???