Well, yes. Massive forest fires are nature's default. The don't jive well with continual human settlement, so we (used to) do our best to suppress them (thankfully).Do all those old historical records show any wildfires that killed over half a billion animals in a month?
Not following what you are putting down .How about all the unnoticed hurricanes in NYC in the last hundred seventy years?
I don't...and I'm not. I question, research, and listen. I don't accept without questioning anything related by today's media. If I did, it would be awful silly to continue to put away for retirement when AOC tells me that the world has less than 12 years left if radical change doesn't happen now...and I know radical change isn't going to happen anytime soon.If you deny the human impact on climate, you are burying your head in the sand.
Case in point. This is a flawed claim.This is from NASA
"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities."
No. The Harrapans were destroyed by a 200 year drought. Akkadians 150 year long drought."Temperature data showing rapid warming in the past few decades, the latest data going up to 2018. According to NASA data, 2016 was the warmest year since 1880, continuing a long-term trend of rising global temperatures. The 10 warmest years in the 139-year record all have occurred since 2005, with the five warmest years being the five most recent years. "
Ten warmest in 170 seems more like a champion, no?
I don't follow.Yes, "quality of the data isn't the same as a 150…100…50 years ago", that's why we know that this is happening. To claim that we were less capable before, and that's why we don't know now doesn't really make sense
I would be 'meh' if I won a competition against a half dozen local competitors and was then declared World Champion. Too small of a sample to make that claim remotely true.
170 years is .000004% of the Earth's existence.
170 years is 1.4% of Civilization.
170 years is ~2.4% of recorded history.
Too small of sample size to support the claims that are made.
In addition, the quality of the data isn't the same as a 150…100…50 years ago. We have weather satellites that map temperatures all over the planet regardless of whether any one lives there or not. 150 years ago, there wasn't a guy stationed every square mile with a thermometer and a notebook tracking every high and low .
The Middle East and Saharan Africa weren't always just giant sand boxes...but they became sand boxes long before industrialization.
We had a tornado a few years ago strike a town ~40miles north of us. I was blown away...I've lived in Oregon nearly 50 years and never heard of a tornado! Well, a little research turned up the tidbit that Oregon averages 2-3 tornadoes a year. Usually on the Eastern half of the state that is vast, and very lightly populated. Most happen without a single witness...but, now we have the eyes in the sky, and they miss nothing .
Enter your email address to join: