Cool Crank Arms

[yoothgeye]

OK, if the red line was really there then it would negate all the improved performance, but since it's not there it makes the crank arms crankier and therefore you can ride faster and easier and stuff. :lol:

 

[bmxerpete]

Supercross tried this in bmx, it didn't work there either. The more zig zags and curves and junk you add to your cranks, the more they will flex...thereby transferring LESS torque to your rear wheel, not more.

 

[Carbon]

I think they should simply invent a reverse gear reduction rear hub that continually makes it easier to pedal the harder you push and the faster you go, kinda like an automatic transmission only it would enable the operator to be stronger as you are propelled faster and faster, and give up on the dead L crank idea.

 

[c.p.odom]

Good to see that not many of you are falling for this nonsense.
This is the same as the PMP crank from the early eighties. Total ........ and I am glad the money spent on the patent was not mine with prior product so well documented.

Check this image of the PMP crank.
http://www.classicrendezvous.com/Italy/PMP_crk_ad.htm

 

[mitchelangelo]

I agree Carbon. This is ultimately a revelation in crank innovation! The circulation of the angle-ation around the nucleus is most certain to achieve successful rotation. The dynamic motion and pure sophistication of this configuration is sure to draw speculation from all of those that witness this creation. So mathematically speaking A+B=C and in this case A+B+C still substantially = C ? Therefore I close with a brain stimulation of comedic exhilaration! :lol:

 

[deorman]

Hey, I know! Instead of failing to re-invent the lever, let's just add multiple gear ratios and adjustable handle bars! :idea: