I think the old knobbies like we had in the 70's (only one kind we could get back then) would look good on this old klunker. It would have a real vintage vibe like it was put together back in the 70's.
Thanks for all your input here @Wildcat !That's going to be a great klunker! The Brooks with copper rivets is icing on the cake.
I used a Shimano 3CC hub for years, it held up, and the coaster brake worked well. No front brake.
I think it was SA who had a 3 speed with a neutral spot where the brakes weren't useable.
I used different shifters on the 3CC hub and they worked, even a nexus shifter. So I think shimano 3 speed shifters are interchangeable. The Murray has a good cable and shifter that can be transferred right over to the klunker. That's a 3 speed with a coaster brake for stopping. A new nexus hub shouldn't be too expensive, but I've found those hubs on women's beach cruisers on CL and gotten them with the wheels all ready to go.
View attachment 264994
The crankset from the Murray is probably the same size as the old frame. If the cups fit the frame there you go. But you might want to use one of those conversion kits that lets you go with a better 3 piece crankset. I used one on my 42 Hawthorne and it was a much better ride.
View attachment 264996
Caliper brakes would need some kind of bracket made up to fit your frame and fork, and they won't have very good stopping power, not as good as drum brakes.
The early klunkers used one speeds, but going offroad for me requires a nice low gear to drop down to, so gears are a must on a klunker. Other than the 3 speeds, 2 speed kickback and 5 speeds are out there too.
View attachment 264997
View attachment 264998
Have you measured the space between the stays for tire clearance? I think 3" would be about as big as you could go.
View attachment 264999
Whatever way you go with this will be good.
Thanks @OddJob !Jude, that looks like a 'true fat bike' tire. You won't be running that on a traditional frame. That requires a fat bike frame or modified rear triangle.
CST has some great tires for cheap prices though. I ran the CST Cheyenne on my Desert Sky klunker build. They have a great tread, a full look when mounted on a standard width rim, and very gnarly mtb quality; all for around $27 a per tire. Hard to beat. Found one from a distributor in New Jersey, you should be able to get them in a couple of days or so.
View attachment 265019
View attachment 265020
I just noticed now that I ran a CST Rock Hawk on the front of this bike. Another grippy, very good mtb tire. I got it because it was slightly wider than the Cheyenne and I like a fatter tire in the front for float and steering grip. Found this pair at a rocking deal of $50 with free shipping! And I have had very good buying experiences from the seller, '365 cycles'.
View attachment 265021
Also with this tire mounted on a traditional 26" rim, you shouldn't have any brake mounting issues. I used an adaptor for the rear frame and mounted Avid BB7 cable actuated disc brake in the rear, because I had a disc ready wheel. In most klunking instances, a single rear brake was plenty of power, especially disc brakes.
Measuring this weekend!Double check the width of your frame for tires before you buy. While these frames were built for 28" tires, I've found that many of them will only accommodate normal or sometimes narrow tires.
Nope! Awesome input! Thank You!Yes, stay away from the old Sturmey Archers with coaster brakes. In fact, I sold a bike with a S3C about a year ago and the guy just brought it back because the “brakes don’t work.” I spent several hours last night rebuilding it. But it is just a bad design and I have decided to do the right thing and build him a new wheel with an AW.
Hope we haven’t hijacked Jude’s thread. Looking forward to this build!
I dig these too…. I’m torn on these vs. a super aggressive knobby tire. Truth be told, i spend a heck of a lot more time on pavement than I do on the grass or dirt!I think the old knobbies like we had in the 70's (only one kind we could get back then) would look good on this old klunker. It would have a real vintage vibe like it was put together back in the 70's.
View attachment 265095
Great build, Jude! Klunkers are probably my favorite to build and ride. They're so cool, functional and just fun. That's a perfect frame and fork combo for it.
The wheelset from that Murray should work pretty well. Then you won't be needing to spread the frame for a wider hub and messing with a derailleur. Although that is fun too. They make BMX brake calipers in different lengths to reach various rim combos so something will likely fit. They'll clear a fairly wide tire too.
Haha! J/K. That Brooks you've got should be just the ticket. I love those and they look the part too.
Solid advice. If your terrain is pretty flat the Murray single chainring will do fine but if you have hills more gears would be desireable.
That price is hard to beat. The earliest klunkers had knobbie-ish cruiser tires since knobby mountain bike tires didn't exist yet. If you have some MTB tires that you like then those will work fine. I'd probably keep the width between 2.125 and 2.4. Narrower looks too skinny and wider might have issues interfering with the brakes.
Alan Bonds built a lot of klunkers back in the Repack days. His klunker page is a great resource for tips and inspiration.
http://clunkers.net/
Loco Joe has a great way to mount caliper brakes to frames that don't have mounts for them
Have fun, I'll be following this build with interest!
Plenty of room for 2.25 for sure. Especially if they have larger knobs along the sides of the tire. Which makes for a more squared off profile.
Thanks!Plenty of room for 2.25 for sure. Especially if they have larger knobs along the sides of the tire. Which makes for a more squared off profile.
A 2.35 - 2.4 might fit if the tire has a more rounded profile.
-I got the 2.25 Rock Hawk for $50 as originally recommended.Plenty of room for 2.25 for sure. Especially if they have larger knobs along the sides of the tire. Which makes for a more squared off profile.
A 2.35 - 2.4 might fit if the tire has a more rounded profile.
I think you could push the envelope on that frame, since you're not running fenders, but 2.25s will be great. Plenty of clearance, should handle well and still be supple depending on pressure. OJ does know his biz.So….. starting the mock-up.
I was shocked actually, at how the 26 x 1.75 tires filled up the fork and rear stays.
I think a 2.5” tire may be a tight fit!
View attachment 265152
View attachment 265153View attachment 265154
Thanks! -I was thinking the 2.4”, but then I thought about the air pressures I typically run and impact on tire size. I do most of my riding on pavement, so usually while in use, the air pressures will be up.I think you could push the envelope on that frame, since you're not running fenders, but 2.25s will be great. Plenty of clearance, should handle well and still be supple depending on pressure. OJ does know his biz.
Super low pressure is helpful on really rough terrain, think about the tire wrapping around chunky rocks and roots. But for smoother stuff and mixed terrain, back and forth from road to gravel and dirt, it isn't needed. I run mine at 30-45 psi for most of my rides. I definitely want enough to protect the rims from impactAs I know most MTB, klunkers in particular run low air pressure, I do prefer running on the high side, so, I’d rather pump up the thinner tires than run lower pressure on the meats!
Tires came in!
View attachment 265590
Thanks Matti! 100%Super low pressure is helpful on really rough terrain, think about the tire wrapping around chunky rocks and roots. But for smoother stuff and mixed terrain, back and forth from road to gravel and dirt, it isn't needed. I run mine at 30-45 psi for most of my rides. I definitely want enough to protect the rims from impact
He’s a friend of mine in the Syracuse Classic Bikes club …. He has at least 500 bikes at any given time (in 2 barns) and a 20’ x 20’ building with every square inch packed with vintage bike parts.What is 500 bike Bruce?
Enter your email address to join: