- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 4,217
- Reaction score
- 9,130
Sam's Club. Specs on the Target Store web site for the same bike lists its weight bearing capacity at 275 pounds, which is high for this sort of bargain bike. I weigh 155 or lets say 170 with all my riding gear on. Target wants $200 for the bike. It's a heavy bike but I might get one to use for a Klunker build. Exchanging the crank for a smaller chain wheel for a 1/8 inch chain might be a problem with the 3 piece crank. It would need new wheels and perhaps a different fork for my MAFAC canti brakes. I have a new Schwinn frame and fork from a Sanctuary that has enough clearance to run 3 inch tires. I wonder if this bike does also once the fenders are removed? If it would fit I am contemplating 57 mm wide rims and 2.8 inch knobbies. The knobs might make it so the tires won't fit. I would ideally build a wheel set using an alloy front hub with sealed bearings and use my vintage Arai drum brake with a Mega Range 6 speed cluster or my nexus 3 speed on the rear. If I use the Mega Range I would have to come up with a crank that fits the bike and a 24 tooth narrow wide chain wheel. For the Mega Range the frame would need spreading. The MAFAC brakes might not fit the 57 mm wide rims? Not sure about the chain line off set either so I can see a lot of problems doing this. All the tossed out parts could be used on my 1940s Columbia frame and fork that I have hanging on the wall. Just using all the parts for my 1940s Columbia would make it a worth while bargain. I have been thinking along these lines for a few years but the modern bargain bikes always had a lighter weight capacity. I have seen these bike use for builds, but not something as extreme as I am proposing. Here is the bike at Sam's Club. Any thoughts.
https://www.samsclub.com/sams/26-in-1952-mens-bike-columbia-cruiser/prod20090815.ip
https://www.samsclub.com/sams/26-in-1952-mens-bike-columbia-cruiser/prod20090815.ip