mesome said:
Rat Rod said:
aka_locojoe said:
You could see the votes before you voted. There was a small little text link at the bottom of the poll that said "view results" or something like that.
Crud...I was afraid of that.
Ah well..it's all for fun anyway. :wink:
It will also show them to you if you're not logged in.
Ah! You see... I thought I was going crazy. I was right after all, and I wasn't hallucinating! ;-)
Thanks guys, for pointing out.
icyuod2 said:
I don't see it making much of a difference. All the bikes are pictured in the gallery. peeps is gonna like what they like, regardless of the votes. :lol:
personally, i kinda like seeing em.
As for voting for yourself, i look at it this way.
If you can't find 3 bikes in the rrbbo (other than your own) worthy of your appreciation/vote.
Well your probably on the wrong forum.
But the fact is... It really does make a difference! It probably doesn't affect the outcome of the top 3 winners, but it does affect the runners-up, who've also build beautifull, if not also top-3 bikes (like yourself). I think in a more honest-votingsystem the runners-up may have ended op higher in the poll. They deserved it. You deserve it.
And the 'voting for yourself'-issue.... I totally agree. But just having that opinion doesn't change the fact that there are people (more than one) who still give one of their votes to their own bike. Strange, but true...
37fleetwood said:
just based on the way the voting has progressed I would guess that seeing the results and following the discussion seriously compromises the results. people naturally divide into camps and vote for one or another of the available (likely to win) choices. usually two pull ahead and people tend to pick between those two. the rest get the remaining votes. it's just human nature to vote for one of the winners. I would find it difficult to believe that the winning two bikes are better than the rest by a 4:1 margin.
now don't get me wrong, the two leading bikes are leading for a reason, I'm not saying they aren't, but the numbers are still skewed
Couldn't have said it better!
garagegoon said:
I think everyone is putting too much thought into the voting and numbers.... Build a bike and have fun watchin others do the same.... Keep it simple stupid..... 8)
Shure!
'Build a bike and have fun.' That's what this site is all about. That's what we're doing all year long.
...UNTILL there is a contest. And if it comes with a voting, better make shure the voting is as honest as it can be. If you're gonna do it, DO IT RIGHT.
Furthermore, this IS a forum and this IS a thread to
discuss the voting. I saw some flaws and just shared them with you all. I can't help think about what I read and see happening. Thinking is fun! Everybody should try it sometime...
;-)
But, like I said before: It would probably be too much of a hassle to make changes to the voting-system, if not impossible... Then leave it be. It isn't thát important, and everyone who's finnished his/her build is a winner and has an awesome 'new' bike. I hope I didn't offend anybody by critisizing the poll, like the three winners, and especially RatrodSteve. The top 3 just are the best bikes of this build. And finaly, it has been said before on this thread, but never enough, so I will say it again:
Steve's doing an awesome job on hosting this site and organizing the build-offs!
Cheers to all.
CLICK HERE! ...to pre-order your Rustrocket Deluxe-shirt and show your support. CLICK HERE!
CLICK HERE! ...to check MYSPACE for me and my ART! CLICK HERE!