Loosen your girdle, 2dawgs I'm not trying to reinterpret the rules; i'm just expressing my opinion. I feel like bikes are built for riding; if you're building an interesting/BA-looking rider, all the better.
I hear what you're saying, and no question, I'd take the built muscle car over the Prius-- if I was borrowing it for the weekend. If I had to own it, live with it, and make payments on it, I guess i'd take the Prius.
One of the best things about bikes is, you can find a balance. A well-planned bike can look good and ride well. I respect a build like that. I'm at the point now where, if I can tell from the ergos that a rider will have his hands stretched out and down, with his face in his crotch and his knees bouncing off his shoulders--- a build like that doesn't look good to me, regardless of stance or lines.
Thankfully, we have choices in this world, and the choices go beyond GTO vs Prius, or stock road bike vs barely-rideable "kustom". There are infinite options in between and around those polar opposites. I, for one, intend to take the bikes' ability to function as a bike into account while voting.
We all know the muscle car will spank a Prius at he drag strip; this is where the car analogy falls apart. The worst POC sold at the local WallyWorld will outpace a bike with unworkable ergos. Surely, we're familiar with the "all show, no go" cliché; I'd think that ppl trying to build custom bikes would try to avoid that pitfall.