Looking good!
I wasn't completely sold on the lower than usual placement of the 'middle' bar at first, but after seeing the money shot I have to say that it has a tough look!
I really respect that, TRM! You are the master of the 'perfect stance', so I take that with the utmost respect. I thought the same when I first saw it mocked up, and now with wheels, bars, fork and saddle; it confirms it.I wasn't completely sold on the lower than usual placement of the 'middle' bar at first, but after seeing the money shot I have to say that it has a tough look!
Spike, I will be changing saddles, and rear light placement for the final go; but I think you might like the final version as well! Stay with me brother!I totally dig that back light placement. Done it the same in my daily cruiser. That frame has a totally tough look to it.
These are Sunlite Sandy Beach model tires. In the States, we have a distribution company called jbi.org that services the local bike shops around the country with about 8 warehouses spread from coast to coast.Yeah the lower straight bar really adds to the 'Phat'ness of the frame...and this was a cool looking frame to begin with. And with the 2.5 tires this is all looking super cool! It's all proportionally Phat
Where did you get those cool tires anyway?
Thanks G! I don't plan on taking this thing off any jumps, so hopefully the copper lugs will hold up.Well that was fun getting caught up in that entire thread . It really Looks killer OJ . I love how the DX top tube flows perfectly with the rear half of the the CwC . I agree with TRM I wasn’t sold on the placement of the second straight bar . But after seeing it all together it works really well . The whole thing about rating is being different and still keeping a cool look . So far you nailed it dude . I also like the added truss bars to the fork . My only concern would be the copper will not be strong enough for your riding stile . You may consider making some steal connectors at your buddy’s shop .
So far [emoji1303][emoji1303] RaToN
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, there's a plan. That's something I hope I can accomplish in the next day or so. It has to do with the 4 speed rear hub.....and there's no 'floor' so it has to go somewhere....I’m thinking you have a plan for that lower lug. Or maybe not. There must be a reason to keep it...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, there's a plan. That's something I hope I can accomplish in the next day or so. It has to do with the 4 speed rear hub.....and there's no 'floor' so it has to go somewhere....
Looks great. The bar placement is very Cycle Truck!
Another factor here was a traditional wheel with no offset where the hub came from, as opposed to my wheel where the holes are off-set to each side of the rim.Great video OJ!
It wouldn't surprise me if those spokes are fine, I have found that the hub flange diameter makes only a tiny difference to spoke length required...
Yeah, it has a very 'beefy' look to it. Especially knowing how it started out. That CWC frame has some nice 'curves' to it....Looks great. The bar placement is very Cycle Truck!
I used the UBI (United Bicycle Institute) spoke length calculator, and dug up some rusty conversion math skills to get there!
Enter your email address to join: