No, I think you guys misunderstood me.
Each entrant only builds one bike. I guess that part was not clear to you... sometimes it's
hard to hear what's going on inside my head.
You build the bike and that part can be the "faceoff" or challenge to the other builder. One
of you is selected as the winner of the first round, I'm assuming by members voting.
Meanwhile a bunch of other builds are going on. Same deal, two bikes face off, one emerges
the winner. Say 16 enter, then we have 8 winners. Those winning bikes are paired off and
we have a second round of votes.
The 4 winners advance and we vote again, head to head. On the last day of the contest,
we have the 2 finalists and the last vote.
You build one bike and you see it advance through the elimination.
I think the only hard part of the contest will be that first round of voting because there will
be a lot of contests. After that the field will slim down and the front runners will emerge.
I think I would allow the first round contests to be able to select their opponents; after that
we will need someone who is not building a bike for this to select the matchups that we'd
vote on.
I think it would be an exciting contest. And since we all find that we like so many bikes on
here, it would be fun to support your favorites through the elimination. The usual way
we've picked winners is good for a big contest, but it's hard to give enough credit to some
really good builds when you can only place a handful of votes.
This way, each bike in each round might get 100's of votes, and I think it's easier on the
voters as well. "Which do you like better, A or B?" Simpler than "vote for the best 5 out of
40"... which is kind of how my town elects City Council, and I never liked that method.
If you guys like this, I'd be happy to draw up some rules.
We could even have two brackets, like East Vs West or Girls vs Boys... the champs from
each side meet in the middle.
Sorry if I wasnt clear before.
--Rob