View attachment 276816
One of the biggest improvements for the HF roller (usually from SWAG offroad) is widening the bottom two rollers, which helps with larger OD tubing (1.5-2.0') as the narrow rollers as HF stock don't have very effective leverage. Having different slots to use should help with that as well as with creating different radii of curves.
The down pressing screw powered by a two-handed crank vs. a 3/4' wrench will help with leverage. (SWAG offers a mod that allows a hydraulic bottle jack, FWIW.)
The gauge to show you how far down you've moved the top roller will help with repeatability. I've been marking the screw with sharpie on my HF roller.
The crank handle instead of the ship's wheel has to be better, if for no other reason than storage, but it looks like it is keyed instead of held with a set screw on flats (one of the weakest points with the HF set.)
View attachment 276818
Yes, SWAG has a lot of upgrades that can make the HF roller quite good, and a variety of dies that work with their upgraded arbor/axle (?), but the dies from HF are pretty low quality and only 3 sized (1", 1-1/2", 2").
The set screws are just a bad design.
Searching a pic of the HF roller, I saw a Grizzly Industries version that looks similar to yours, though lacks the gauge and the crank handle attachment looks different.
View attachment 276819
and at the current price of $549 USD, is a better deal than the HF roller with upgrades, esp considering the cost of the SWAG dies, --- but I haven't looked into the cost of this machine's dies or the weaknesses or flaws. --- but I will look into them and may be tempted to change course depending on what I find.
edit... there seems to be a simplicity and ACCESSIBILITY to the lower dies that far outshines the HF. They are a pain to change. The top one is too. And lining up the set screws to the axle flats...
edit 2: ... and see how your's and the Grizzly have a flange that can be clamped or screwed down to a bench for stability? hmmmm...