If I respond to your comment it isn’t because I don't like you, it's because you wrote something that struck a chord with me.
Upper Class White Trash said:
i can't put them in the same arena as the greats fighting for civil rights [...] gettin in the way and being a problem is not the solution.
I only used "the greats fighting for civil rights" as an example because it isn't obscure, and they were a group who were quite the nuisance at the time of their protest but, have gone down in history as revolutionaries. Getting in the way draws attention to oneself and, hopefully, a problem of sorts. Making PSA's, having a 5k run, and posting flyers at the local coffee shop don't express the same amount of urgency that blocking roads during the evening commute carries.
The most influential book on morals in western Christian society (which the US is a part of) is the Bible. At the risk of losing what little credibility I have, I'll say this: The New Testament would agree with you. The Old Testament would not. Depends how you reconcile the difference between the two.
CCR said:
Korporal said:
... I challenge you to make a (short) list of history makers who did not cause trouble.
... :? Thats too broad my friend and I dont know if I could meet your standards. I sorely decline.
That was a poor question asked in an attempt to lure you one direction, in which, I already had my counter argument polished and ready for deployment.
Upper Class White Trash said:
so the "MAN" wants them under his thumb and has some underlying Conspiracy to oppress the bikers of cali.
No conspiracy. Just cyclist awareness in hopes of not getting pinched between a parked car and somebody turning right without signaling or checking. And it’s in more states than California.
i bet 100 dollars if you compared whatever they were "protesting" to human rights to the chick in the blazer when it was going on. she would have popped somebody..
See my above comment on why I choose civil rights as a comparison. It was not a passive decision or an attempt to bring the two causes to the same level.
please post any other links on what they are about. i don't want to have a half informed view
Any report (about anything) you encounter has inherent bias built in. The creator of the report will try to eliminate or exaggerate that bias (depending on their purpose). Having people post links will further this bias as (now this one has been empirically proven by experimental psychologists) nobody wants to be wrong. Because of this, the links you will receive will be biased towards the posters argument. I applaud you for requesting more information. However, I challenge you to obtain it yourself.
socal_jack said:
it is entirely within the realm of possibility that these CM people staged the whole scene [...] another video of these "people" on Youtube
While it's entirely within the realm of possibility that the collision was staged, it's also entirely in the realm of possibility that there's a spaceship full of donkeys aimlessly hurtling through space and beaming root beer into the oceans of the universe. Just because it's suggested and not disprovable, doesn't mean that it's true. How did CM riders lose their status as .... Sapien Sapiens and become merely imitations of people?
If you want to know anymore, try your local CL bike classifieds, usually someone will post something about a ride. Here in SD they get called out by local riders and the ads removed since they just make things worse for people that really enjoy riding bikes.
While I've said this, and others since you posted, it depends where you are. In some cities children, highschoolers, college students, working professionals, middle aged parents with full grown children who wear suits to work everyday, addicts, homeless, messengers, hippies, commies, republicans, and democrats all get together and have a fun ride with minimal (with respect to the above video) anger and spread whatever message it is they ride for. In other cities CM is made up of mostly angry college students and messengers who want to do something and be heard. Many fall in the middle.
Upper Class White Trash said:
anger feeds anger! [...] "you'll get more with honey then you get with vinegar"
To step away from my previous Bible statement. Psychologists (especially those concerned with development and parenting) have empirically proven what you say. However, other psychologists (especially those concerned with emotions and clinical practices) have shown cathartic benefits to releasing anger. Anger is natural and trying not to feel anger will (also proven by psychologists) make you crazy. The trouble comes when releasing the anger causes harm. I do not see what type of harm the riders are causing by expressing their anger. The motorists expression of anger mangles bikes and crushes a riders foot. I consider that lucky as motor vehicle vs. pedestrian collisions usually result in more harm on the cyclists part than this one. The cyclists reaction to the motorists anger is more anger, which results in angering the motorist more and the cycle continues. Add in a bit of panic and not much happens other than people pissing each other off. Who was angry first? The cyclist or to motorist? See my previous post. In some cities CM riders are angry as they ride. However, what harm comes out of cyclists riding together angry? If nothing feeds the anger (such as driving into the mass) then it'll fizzle out, the mass will break up, and they might get a beer or two and talk about the mass. Sounds like stress relief without harm, which has been proven to be healthy.
In Response to All:
What I'm getting at in my (long) posts is that CM, even confrontational ones, can be viewed as a symptom of a problem rather than a problem itself. Something is causing these people to mass and cause a ruckus. One possibility is that they're sick of being
DiscoStu said:
spit on, hit 3 times by cars, yelled at, cursed at, forced off the road into ditches and curbs, as well as many other unpleasantries while biking/commuting
and that blocking the evening commute once a month is the only way they can get their point across. While other mediums exist the problem has become urgent enough to riders that they feel a need to make the problem urgent to others as well. Other very rational views exist on CM, I'm presenting what my take is on the matter, and defending it with (admittedly academic) knowledge that I happen to remember when I make my argument. And if I'm succeeding, a few of you who read this will look at the thing a bit differently, but that doesn't mean you have to agree with me.