Peatbog said:Hey, you got eggnog? Or maybe a comma? :mrgreen:
Anyway, moving on, let's insert more commotion into the equation. The voting thing which has been mentioned concerning people campaigning on facebook and stuff. I don't have facebook or twitter or any of that stuff (I don't even have a cell phone), so that makes it easier to not do any of that and it also keeps my life simpler. But if the voting is a problem, then we could really make it a fun build like people say the main point is anyway by just eliminating the voting. Hark, do I here silence!? Okay, maybe just allow those who have entered a bike to vote. That would eliminate any extraneous mayhem in the voting situation. Or maybe just the builder and their mother could vote. Or only people who start with a girl's frame could vote. And they can vote twice.
But having a GT Ruckus in the build will be cool. We need more BMX bikes in the mix.
I have gone back and forth on this. I do believe social media can affect the outcome. I also think that guys who are in a bicycle club probably vote for their buddies. I think some areas of the country tend to be more bicycle focused, that may affect who votes for which bike. Can I do anything about this? Nope, the only way I can have any affect at all on the outcome is to build the best bike I can with my limited abilities.
I think some votes are cast without the voter ever looking at a build thread. I truly make an effort to read every build thread. Should my vote count more than a casual users vote? Nope, voting is voting regardless how unqualified or uninformed the voter is. The way I see it, the contest helps bring attention to the website. Limiting the voting to builders only wouldn't give a casual browser an incentive to join the site.
Rg