It ain't the nanner.DOES THIS NANNER MAKE MY BUTT LOOK FAT!!!!!
It ain't the nanner.DOES THIS NANNER MAKE MY BUTT LOOK FAT!!!!!
On one hand the nanner would look best slammed to the frame.
On the other hand the tractor spring would make it more rideable and more comfortable. Instead of messing with the spring why not simply use a triangle piece between the spring and the frame (one side bolts to the frame, one side to the spring)? The third side of the triangle, facing the tire could be shaped in a curve to mimic the tire curve. This is the easiest way to have the spring where and how you want it.
Wow, a lot of info, I am trying not to miss something... I think the lamp shroud for the nanner, the jet rear light on the rack and the curved front grill all work very well together. The front grill with the ring in the middle looks terrific!
I liked the Ruff seat pan, but I think I like the nanner more.
The faux Monark would take away from the wheels, I fear.
Banana is king, and don't tell Skipton, but the flipped clubman bars are my fave so far.
Is there a chance the spring nanner could hit the wheel under compression? Maybe some type of bump stop? A rubber baby buggy bumper or something
Yep that’s the fast way to ride. Seat a little further back for me... looking good!Yeah, I think @Skipton would like that riding position too, but he would want the seat back a good bit further.
View attachment 121086
I don't know man, I just can't get into this one. It reminds me of Steve Martin's nose in Roxanne.I was one spot away from becoming a Page 2 Slacker again.
After dinner, there was still a little daylight, so I pull SteamRoller out for a new mockup.
After staring at ALLLLLL the tractor spring mockups, I'm just not sold on using it yet. It just seems to out of scale or something. I think I might go with a banana seat with a sissy bar sticking up through the holey Higgins rack.
When I was leaving my office I saw the Long John Saddle that I got from @Dr. Tankenstein and just felt it deserved a tryout. Here it is. If you are unfamiliar with these seats, they are sorta like the love child of a regular 60s saddle and a flat banana seat.
First I tested it without the rack. It's a little lower than it would be if I mounted it.
View attachment 121396View attachment 121397View attachment 121398View attachment 121399
Then I took the sissy bar off and mocked it with the rack.
View attachment 121400View attachment 121401View attachment 121402View attachment 121403
I'm a Monark guy from the git-go, and I'd of never thought to use the fork for a suspension sissy bar. Brilliant, just Brilliant!
Any way you choose, I’m sure, as usual, this bike will be ridiculously unique and appealing, but I still like the springy nanner with the rack.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If I know soul, and I don't.Which one are you calling the springy nanner? Do you mean the tractor spring with the nanner?
I am leaning towards the high back nanner, but with the Monark springs, but also with the holey Higgins rack. I just can't really mock it up without holes in the rack yet.
I don't know man, I just can't get into this one. It reminds me of Steve Martin's nose in Roxanne.
I'm sure this saddle has it's place somewhere, but I'm not sure it's this bike.
Long John is the best looking saddle with the rear rack, to me anyway. That last config with the springer rear seat support is really cool! It just feels like it needs more mass. Could you add a thicker set of braces or something to get more 'weight' back there to offset those beefy Pro Flex forks?