Would you like to have your bike run over? If you thought the deserved it because they were protesting, did the civil rights protesters of the days of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. deserve to be beaten, arrested, fire hosed? How about the violence involved in the pro-life/pro-choice "debate?" Should anti-war protestors be arrested in the hundreds? (Happened a few days ago in San Fransisco).
socal_jack said:
Those Critical Mass rides are pretty much a bunch anarchists out to cause trouble
In some cities Critical Mass rides are massive (San Fransisco comes to mind again) but remain peacful and resemble a big party more than anarchy. In other cities riders confront motorists, "take streets," block intersections, swarm cars which enter the pack, and try to disrupt the flow of traffic as much as possible. While it' convinent to call rides like those anarchistic, it presents a greater challenge to find out why the mass is confronational with motorists. In the posted video, one motorists asks what the ride is about. This is not uncommon and most riders will give answers which include fossil fuel use, global warming or a variation. Most commonly, biker saftey and biker rights comes up. In bike not-so-friendly cities (Boston comes to mind) it is not uncommon to see riders in the mass with tacoed wheels from encounters they, or a friend, have had with motorists while riding. Maybe they confronation is used to bring attention to the issue of getting squashed by a car while riding.
CCR said:
when you start trouble your asking for more trouble.
I'll assume that by starting trouble you mean holding a confrontational Critical Mass. To use your own logic against you, the motorists started the trouble by being inconsiderate to riders. But that's just me being silly and one could say the riders started the trouble by being on the roads in the first place. To get out of this backpedaling chicken and egg logic, lets consider some people who were trouble makers. All the Americal revolutionaries, Martin Luther (of the reformation), early folk/hip-hop/blues/elctronic/jazz/rock musicians, the "beat" authors, Socrates, Darwin, and a bit more personal-- rat rodders. Today's trouble makers often become tommorow's history makers. If nobody got other's feathers in a tizzy not much change would happen. Biologicaly speaking, variety is vital. I challenge you to make a (short) list of history makers who did not cause trouble.