Just finished reading this post, and I thought some might appreciate, and contemplate some perspective from an "inside the bike industry" lifer:
I think it is healthy to critique, compare, and brain storm what should and should not be done to make a good bike, a better America, crazy stuff, whatever. That is the beauty of the internet. But often when you read and see a sort of "mob mentality" brewing in a forum, it is interesting to see if it will spiral out of control, or if a dose of sanity will be infused, or where it will turn next.
In the case of the Fritz Fifty , I thought I would throw some information out there to chew on, because I often read in this and every other form of social media, about "American made", and "greedy companies", and "Chinese crap" etc.
So here are a few things that may effect your opinions: (or not)
First, I would like to ask you this question: "Do you think that anyone gets into the bicycle industry to get rich??" The folks at most bike companies want to do everything possible to create great bikes. No one is rubbing their hands together saying "haha I just made a POS when people wanted a high quality expensive bike". Yes there are some cheap "trollers" out there, but no one gets into bikes to purposefully bring things down. That is a much more complex machine that WE as Americans created. We drove our own factories out of business, (Schwinn, TWICE) WE demanded cheap goods from China, and WE decided to reward the low quality products, and not give our dollars to builders of prideful high end machinery.
I have to laugh at the comment that said that the $60 bike would be $200 if made in the USA!! Are you kidding?? If it were made in the USA, it would be the same POS. (unless it was 10 times the price) China is not the problem; What we ask them to build, what we accept at retail, and what we value is the problem. An FYI, a Schwinn Stingray from 1970 would retail for over $600 today. And that is ONLY if they are being made in the volume that they made then, when you did not change tooling every six months, but every six years. AND if American workers were willing to have a working wage that is lower than today. You want that factory job? Yeah, me neither.
Before this turns into a book that everyone picks apart (too late), all I mean is that "product managers do not choose cheap", or "not what I would use" parts because they are trying to make a crappy bike, they choose these parts because they may have no other options, be it tooling, cost, volume, etc.
So for example the stem: Back in 1970, Schwinn made it's own parts, or farmed them out to sub contractors. But today, for 500 pieces, a steel forged stem? Yeah right. Try the clamping force; The alloy will bite much better in today's manufacturing ability anyway. I don't like it, but I see why they did it. I would have polished the rims though...(what were they thinking?!)
I do agree that there is no point in making this bike with poor Chrome, and poor parts, but the alternative was not to make it. For 500 pieces, the marketing it can generate, and the revenue (arguably none), it is probably about all they could do.
What will change things is what was said in the forum; Support American manufacturing. But just know ahead of time, that means much higher costs. I read lots of comments about how much the tires were wanted, with no guilt about them being made in a Chinese sweat shop.
America has a bigger problem to address than just "made in the USA", it is "Do you or anyone you know want to work in a sweat shop?". We will need to take a step backwards from the expectation of wealth that we have today, to a point where you buy 1 bicycle every 10 years, like you did in 1970.......Then you can build a Stingray of quality in the USA. Simple economics, ask yourself how much "stuff" people owned then, and how much "crap" we own today, and you start to see that it is a very entangled web of economics, culture, entitlement and short sighted people/companies/government that makes a Chinese bicycle "demanded" by the market...Now go ride your bike, and let's figure out how to put America to work, by understanding the reasons we got here first, so we don't do it again.